Skip to content

How we judge and rank

The fit question that comes before the price, what beats what when two documents disagree, where the commission pulls, and the two sentences this site refuses to write.

What follows is written to be checked against the pages it produced. A method nobody can hold against its own output is a statement of intent; so each rule below says what it rules out, not only what it prefers.

Fit is decided first, because here it decides everything

On most shelves compatibility is a footnote. On this one it comes before the price, because half of what is sold here physically cannot go on half of what the reader already owns. A brake width narrower than the waist of the ski will not mount. A ski crampon made for one pin binding does not enter another maker's slot. A spare lens fits one frame family and not a shape. A GripWalk sole is not accepted by every binding ever sold, and a touring sole by fewer still.

So every page states the fit as a figure or a named system, taken from what the maker published: the brake width in millimetres, the DIN range, the sole standards accepted, the skin width and the ski length it was cut for, the frame the lens belongs to, the baseplate pattern a binding disc matches. What fits what is settled by a dimension or a list a manufacturer wrote down, never by two objects looking as though they belong together. Where a maker publishes none of it, the page reports the answer as unpublished rather than deducing it from a photograph or a model name.

The snow is the variable nobody sells

Nobody sells the snow, and it decides more than anything in the basket. A wax whose band reads −4 °C to −12 °C is measured against snow temperature, not air temperature, and used outside that band it drags or wears off within the hour. A category 3 lens is unusable in the flat light of a storm; a category 1 is dangerous in spring glare. A skin that grips a cold skin track lets go on refrozen crust. A boot flex that suits a heavy skier at speed does not bend at all under a light one on a cold morning.

A page therefore reports the condition each figure was published against, and records the silence where a listing gives none. On several shelves here the condition is missing far more often than it is printed — glove insulation weights, run times for a heated warmer, the snow a wax was tested in — and a figure sold without its condition is being sold for every day of the season at once.

No figure travels without the party that published it

No figure on this site is printed without naming who published it. Not in a footnote, not implied by a logo on the packaging — beside the figure, in the same table row or the same sentence.

The reason is practical rather than high-minded. A figure with a source attached can be followed back, argued with, or corrected by somebody who writes in; a figure without one leaves nothing to do but take it on trust. Where a manual and a marketplace listing disagree, the manual is what gets printed. Where neither says anything, the field stays empty and the page calls it empty — because a plausible substitute, once set in the same type as everything around it, is indistinguishable from something somebody measured.

The fifth winter, in four questions

  • Which part goes first, and whether it can be bought on its own. Edges, base, skin glue, boot liners, goggle anti-fog coating, brake arms, scraper edges, strap ratchets: every family has one. The page names it and says whether a spare or a service exists, because that single fact separates equipment with a service life from equipment with a component life.
  • What the carton is missing. The binding a ski is sold without, and the mounting that is not included either. The boots a step-on binding requires. The cutting tool a skin needs if it is not supplied. The wax a new base wants before its first day. Anything that must be bought before the first run was never the price on the label, and the page puts the difference back.
  • What the day has to provide. A bench and a stable iron before a hot wax means anything. A bootfitter within reach, for a shell that can be punched. A binding technician for a release setting, which is not a number to guess at home. These are stated often enough to compare, and they rule a purchase out rather than ranking it.
  • Whether anyone sells it where you live. Each reference is confirmed market by market before publication, and each page names the stores where a price was found. Excellent equipment that nobody stocks in your country is an annoyance rather than a recommendation.

Which document wins when two of them disagree

For anything dimensional — brake widths, Mondopoint sizes, last widths in millimetres, skin widths and lengths, probe lengths, crampon widths, head circumferences, what a spare states it fits — the manufacturer's own documentation is read first and the marketing headline last. The order reverses for whatever is set in the largest type on the box, for the plain reason that the largest type exists to sell.

Standards, declared categories and approval marks come second, and they are treated as claims awaiting re-confirmation rather than permanent properties. A maker revises a shell, a liner or a supplied strap without changing the model name, and a standard is revised on a schedule of its own.

Owners several winters in come third, and on one question nothing replaces them. No specification sheet records whether a buckle still closes in its fourth season, whether a skin still holds after forty days of folding, whether an anti-fog coating survived one wipe with a wet glove, or whether anyone answers the spares address. Where a judgement rests mainly on one of the three, the page says which. Where none of the three answers, the page says so rather than reasoning its way to a number.

Transcribed, never calculated

Numbers are what this trade sells on, and a number is the one thing in a listing that gets repeated without anybody thinking about it. One rule covers every page that prints one: every length, waist width, radius, flex index, last width, Mondopoint size, DIN range, brake width, filter category, temperature band, volume in litres, spike count, stated load and mass on this site is copied from the manufacturer, in the unit it was published in, with its source named — and not one of them is recalculated, converted or inferred here. Where a maker publishes nothing at all, the page states that in so many words.

The wax shelf is where that rule earns its keep. Converting a temperature band from one maker's scale to another's takes a moment, and the band it produced would look entirely authoritative set in the same typeface as everything around it. It would also be our band rather than the maker's, resting on an equivalence nobody published, and nothing in the typography would tell a reader which of the two they were looking at.

A place inside one family, and never a mark out of ten

Nothing here carries a score. A single mark would have to weigh a touring ski against a pair of hand warmers, and there is no honest exchange rate between those two things. What a page gives instead is a position inside one family, with the sentence that earned it printed alongside.

A family is ordered from the modest end upward, not from the costly end down. Almost everybody arrives with a budget already settled and one specific gap to fill, and a page that opens on the dearest item on the shelf is answering a question nobody asked.

One pull is peculiar to this subject, and naming it works better than quietly resisting it. Winter equipment is sold on ability the buyer does not yet have. Build a page around that and it recommends the stiffest boot, the narrowest race ski and the category 4 lens in every family, because more can always be argued for. A 130-flex boot on an intermediate is a boot that never bends; a race lens on a snowing afternoon is a skier who cannot see the terrain. Where the honest answer is that the more serious item would make the day worse, that is the answer the page gives.

One bias cannot be structured away. This site covers what can be bought through the Amazon stores of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Equipment sold only through mountain shops and ski-service counters is under-represented here as a result, and wherever that shapes a conclusion the page says so.

Two sentences this site does not write, and where the manual takes over

Neither of these two limits moves, and both are better stated outright than left for a reader to deduce. Nothing here — no helmet, no airbag pack, no wrist guard, no impact short — is described as making anything safe. A page reports what the maker specifies for its own product: the liner fitted, the standard cited, the pad layout stated, the release range printed, the service interval named, the parts due for replacement. The rest belongs to those instructions and to the rules of the place you are skiing, because whether a day is survived depends on the snowpack, the weather, the party and the decisions taken on the hill — and no listing knows any of that.

And no page here says which equipment your skiing needs. A length, a flex and a waist width are properties of a product measured against an assumed skier. What a particular person requires depends on their weight, their speed, where they ski, how often and with whom — none of that is printed on any carton, none of it is ours to state, and it is the one recommendation this site is structurally unable to make honestly.

None of this replaces the manufacturer's instructions, and two things belong to a workshop rather than to a web page: a binding release setting, which is set and tested on a bench against a skier's height, weight, age and boot sole length, and any structural repair to a base or an edge. For those, for the avalanche training an airbag pack assumes, and for the maintenance a season demands, the page points at the documents and the people rather than rewording them — even though a page that stops there earns nothing.

The questions asked most often

Has a maker ever paid for a place in a family here?

No, and there is no mechanism to pay into — no listing fee, no seeded sample, no arrangement of any kind. If that ever changed, the page concerned would carry the fact in its own body, where a reader of that page would meet it, and not in small print at the foot of the site.

Who wrote down the figures on these pages?

One of three parties, and each page names which: the manufacturer, the body behind a standard where one is cited, or owners writing after a season or two of their own. A DIN range or a filter category therefore arrives attached to somebody who put their name to it.

Why does a cheaper item sometimes sit above a dearer one?

Because the order follows what survives a winter rather than the price list. A binding whose brake width is stocked in four sizes and whose heel piece is still serviced is a binding usable in its fifth season; a dearer one whose spare parts vanished with last year’s model is a problem the first time something breaks. What earns the place is what is still skiable in year five.

Do any of these pages end by telling me to buy nothing at all?

Several do, and they earn us nothing. Drying liners overnight rather than zipping them into a bag, having a binding checked on a bench instead of guessing a setting, scraping and brushing the wax already in the base, buying one thin merino sock instead of two thick ones — each changes more than most purchases, and each costs an evening at most.

Why will this site not tell me whether something is safe?

Because no published document supports that sentence. A rotational liner, a release range or a stated pad layout is what a maker or a standards body wrote down for one product used one way; whether a particular slope, a particular day and a particular skier make it safe depends on none of that. So the figure is printed, its condition stated, the standard named, and the page stops where the evidence stops.

Why will this site not tell me which ski I need?

Because the skier is not a property of the ski. A length, a waist width and a flex are published against an assumed weight, speed and snow that the listing almost never describes, and you either match the assumption or you do not. The pages give the figure, the assumption where a maker states one, and say plainly where the published number stops being usable.

Last reviewed 28 September 2026